Ethics 的意见s Substantively Affected by the Amended 规则 (Effective 2/1/07)

由2007年2月1日起生效.C. 上诉法院修订了《澳门赌场官网》进行的最全面的修订, 1991. Although the vast majority of opinions issued by the D.C. 在修订规则生效日期之前，澳门赌场官网协会法律道德委员会(“委员会”)实质上不受修订的影响, there are some that simply no longer provide complete guidance in light of the recent changes. 它是至关重要的, 因此, 任何寻求委员会意见指导的人应特别注意规则或意见自意见发表以来以相关方式发生变化的可能性. Some of the changes are “non-substantive,” such as the renumbering of a Rule section or a Comment. 在这种情况下, 委员会的意见仍然有效, even though a particular citation to a Rule or a Comment may no longer be consistent with the current version. The Committee urges anyone consulting an opinion to read it in light of the revised 规则 and Comments. 在下面的表格中, 委员会确定了下列意见, 在它的判断, 受经修订的规则的实质影响:

的意见s Substantively Affected by the Amended 规则 (Effective 2/1/07)
的意见	相关的变化
意见211: Fee Agreements; Mandatory Arbitration Clauses	D.C. 规则1.已修订第8(g)(2)条，以澄清澳门赌场官网就玩忽职守提出的申索或潜在申索的条件. [13]评论现在解释说，规则并不禁止澳门赌场官网与客户就法律过失索赔的强制仲裁达成协议, and there is no requirement that the client have separate counsel before such an agreement is permissible.
意见212在代理前客户的澳门赌场官网离开澳门赌场官网事务所后，对前客户的重大相关事项持反对意见	D.C. 规则1.第10(c)条现允许澳门赌场官网事务所代理与客户利益直接相反的人，而该客户的利益由一名曾与该澳门赌场官网事务所有关联的澳门赌场官网代表, so long as none of the remaining lawyers has any information protected by D.C. 规则1.那对这件事很重要.
意见217: Multiple Representation; Intermediation	D.C. 规则2.2已被淘汰, and the discussion of intermediation and common representation has been moved to Comments [14] through [18] of D.C. 规则1.7.
意见218: Retainer Agreement Providing for Mandatory Arbitration of Fee Disputes Is Not Unethical	注释[1]到D.C. 规则1.现解释第(a)段的规定不适用于客户与澳门赌场官网之间的一般费用安排, 都是由D控制的.C. 规则1.5. 此外，注释[13]到D.C. 规则1.故选D.C. 规则1.8 generally permits lawyers to enter into agreements to arbitrate any legal malpractice claim.
意见219:道德义务冲突	D.C. 规则1.6(d)现允许其服务被用于进一步犯罪或欺诈的澳门赌场官网在某些情况下披露客户的机密和秘密，以防止犯罪或欺诈或减轻客户的犯罪或欺诈造成的伤害. Because a lawyer is now permitted to make certain disclosures under D.C. 规则1.6、D项下的披露义务.C. 规则4.1 (b)和3.3(d) – both of which are expressly made subject to the obligations under D.C. 规则1.6 -现在可能更广泛.
意见232:多个客户/刑事事务	D.C. 规则1.7(c)项已修订，要求每一位可能受影响的客户对(b)段禁止的陈述提供知情同意，且澳门赌场官网合理地认为该澳门赌场官网将能够向每一位受影响的客户提供称职和勤勉的陈述.
意见238:书面收费协议	D.C. 规则1.5(b)已被修订，要求书面收费协议不仅描述收费的基础或费率，而且还描述澳门赌场官网代理的范围和客户将负责的费用.
意见243:离婚案件中的联合代理	D.C. 规则2.2已被淘汰, and the discussion of intermediation and common representation has been moved to Comments [14] through [18] of D.C. 规则1.7.
意见253: Referral Fee Arrangement Between Law Firms and Insurance Companies	D.C. 规则7.1(b)(5)被消去了. 作为一个结果, a portion of the opinion is no longer applicable – specifically, the discussion about the relationship between the prohibition on sharing fees with nonlawyers in D.C. 规则5.4、D中的条款.C. 规则7.1(b)(5) that had permitted lawyers to pay referral fees to intermediaries under certain conditions.
意见264: Refunds of Special Retainers; Commingling of Such Funds with the General Funds of the Law Firm Upon Receipt	D.C. 规则1.15(d) has been revised significantly since this opinion was issued. 特别是,D.C. 规则1.15(d) now provides that advances of unearned fees and unincurred costs shall be treated as property 的客户端. The opinion’s contrary determination was based on a prior version of D.C. 规则1.15(d).[1]
意见273: Ethical Considerations of Lawyers Moving from One Private Law Firm to Another	D.C. 规则1.10 (c)现在允许公司代表残疾人利益前客户实质性不利的事项,或显著相关的是一样的,以前相关澳门赌场官网代表客户在公司剩余的澳门赌场官网都没有任何信息保护的D.C. 规则1.那对这件事很重要. The opinion’s contrary conclusion was based on the prior version of D.C. 规则1.10(c).
意见275:除非可以设置屏蔽，否则接收机密信息将阻碍其他客户就相同或实质性相关事项进行后续陈述	D.C. 规则1.10(a) no longer contains the potential-client exception to the imputed disqualification of a law firm. 该异常现在包含在一个新规则D中.C. 规则1.18(d).
意见279: Availability of Screening as Cure for Imputed Disqualification	D.C. 规则1.10(a) no longer contains the potential client exception to the imputed disqualification of a law firm. 该异常现在包含在一个新规则D中.C. 规则1.18(d).
意见286:或有转诊费	D.C. 规则7.1(b)(5)被消去了. 该意见讨论了《澳门赌场官方软件》如何标志着背离了以前的道德法，并授权向其他人支付某些款项，以便转递合法业务，这种讨论已不再适用.
意见294: 退休澳门赌场官网出售澳门赌场官网事务所	D.C. 规则1.17是一个新的管理销售的法律实践. 这个规则(连同评论[10])授权销售的法律实践,只要不是由销售增加收费之间的转移和现有客户安排澳门赌场官网和客户端转移到费用和采购工作的范围是荣幸的澳门赌场官网.
意见296: Joint Representation: Confidentiality of Information	D.C. 规则2.2已被删除，注释[14]-[18]到D.C. 规则1.7 have been added to address special considerations in common representation. 此外,维.C. 规则1.6(d)现允许其服务被用于进一步犯罪或欺诈的澳门赌场官网在某些情况下披露客户的机密和秘密，以防止犯罪或欺诈或减轻客户的犯罪或欺诈造成的伤害.
意见299: Duty of Confidentiality to the Corporate Client That Has Ceased Operations	D.C. 规则1.6(d)现允许其服务被用于进一步犯罪或欺诈的澳门赌场官网在某些情况下披露客户的机密和秘密，以防止犯罪或欺诈或减轻客户的犯罪或欺诈造成的伤害.
意见302: Soliciting Plaintiffs for Class Action Lawsuits or Obtaining Legal Work Through Internet-Based Web Pages	D.C. 规则7.1(b)(5)被消去了. 作为一个结果, 部分意见不再适用，特别是关于澳门赌场官网必须采取哪些步骤，当支付费用参加一个基于网络的投标服务，以满足D.C. 规则7.1(b)(5).
意见306: Practicing Law While Simultaneously Selling Insurance	D.C. 规则5.7是新的. 它规定，澳门赌场官网在提供与提供法律服务相关的合理服务时，应受《澳门赌场官方软件》的约束. 这个观点与D保持一致.C. 规则5.7, but it relied only on Comment [25] (now renumbered [36]) to D.C. 规则1.7 for the conclusion that a lawyer may sell insurance products to clients so long as the lawyer makes full disclosure, 获得同意, and concludes that his or her professional judgment on behalf 的客户端 will not be adversely affected.
意见307: Participation in Government Program Requiring Payment of Percentage of Fee	D.C. 规则7.1(b)(5)被消去了. 作为一个结果, a portion of the opinion is no longer applicable – specifically, 关于澳门赌场官网在参加政府举办的法律服务计划时必须采取哪些步骤的讨论，以满足D.C. 规则7.1(b)(5).
意见311: Choice-of-Law 规则 for Professional Conduct in Non-Judicial Proceedings	D.C. 规则8.5(b)(1)现在更广泛地适用于与“有待法庭审理的事项”有关的行为，而不仅仅是与“澳门赌场官网已获准在其上执业的法庭程序”有关的行为.”
意见329: 非营利组织 Organization Fee Arrangement with an Attorney to Whom It Refers Matters	D.C. 规则5.4(a)(5) now provides that a lawyer may share legal fees with a nonprofit organization that employed, 保留, 或推荐雇佣该澳门赌场官网，并符合《澳门赌场官网》第501(c)(3)条规定的免税条件. 该意见的要求，只允许补偿非营利性的现金支出，而不提供部分费用已不再必要的D.C. 规则5.4(a)(5) now expressly authorizes the sharing of legal fees under these circumstances.

[1]在1996年发表264号意见时，D.C. 规则1.15(d) provided that “[a]dvances of legal fees and costs become the property of the lawyer upon receipt. 在澳门赌场官网终止服务时，任何未支付的预付费用必须按照规则1退还给客户.16(d).“维.C. 上诉法院修正D.C. 规则1.15(d), 1月1日起, 2000, 澄清,, “除非客户同意另一种安排，未挣得的费用和未发生的费用的预支应按照第(a)款视为客户的财产，直至已挣或已发生为止.虽然D.C. Court of Appeals also made some minor modifications to D.C. 规则1.15(d) in the most recent amendments that became effective on February 1, 2007, the earlier amendments to the rule are the ones directly relevant to 意见264.